comme vous le savez peut-être, ce week-end s'est tenue en Suède la conférence des Parti Pirates internationaux. Le PP de France n'y était pas présent (faute de moyens, de temps, de disponibilités, et puis aussi parce que je ne veux plus dormir avec Daedalus, il pue trop des pieds). Nous avons envisagé un moment de leur envoyer un petit texte, et comme la fin d'année scolaire était chargé pour tout le monde on a juste fait profil bas.
Sur la mailing list internationale, tout le monde a l'air de s'exciter en ce moment (enfin comme d'habitude quand je dis "tout le monde" c'est surtout Carlos Ayala, du parti pirate d'Espagne), en particulier autour d'une idée en rapport avec le projet de présenter le Parti Pirate aux élections européennes de 2009.
La question, d'après ce que j'ai compris, est de savoir si nous devons considérer l'hypothèse de nous intégrer ou non à un groupe parlementaire existant, donc passer des alliances avec des partis politiques déjà établis. Question épineuse, puisque le Parti Pirate se veut un parti complètement affranchi de la politique traditionnelle, mais qu'en même temps il faut parfois aborder ces choses avec pragmatisme pour avoir une chance d'obtenir ne serait-ce qu'un siège au Parlement.
En dehors de cette question, il a également été rédigé une déclaration qui rejoint et actualise la déclaration de principe du Parti Suédois de 2006. Je vous la colle en brut, car elle n'apporte rien de vraiment novateur (même si elle a suscité quelques débats enflammés, en particulier auprès de notre ami Carlos).
Copyright is well out of touch with today's cultural landscape. It has evolved into an obstacle to creativity, particularly grass roots creativity. We need at least these changes to copyright law:
- Copyright is commercial
Copyright only regulates commercial activity. (Local law usually defines "commercial activity" in sufficient detail.) Non-commercial activity is never regulated by copyright law.
- Sharply reduced monopoly term
Copyright is a limited commercial monopoly that expires well within one generation. The exact term is left to the local pirate party.
- No media or hardware levies
No levies to compensate for copying should be permitted - but we allow for government scholarships or similar, which are not compensation. This way, it's obviously unilateral, and the copyright lobby doesn't have the implied right to accept or reject.
- Parliament writes copyright law, not the lobby
Technical measures that prevent consumers from using culture in ways permitted by law, so-called DRM technologies, are outlawed.
- Derivative works always permitted
Instead of having derivative works normally prohibited except in quite fuzzy fair use exceptions, under our copyright, derivative works are always permitted (not covered by the original copyright), with exceptions to this very specifically enumerated in law with minimal room for interpretation (like "direct translations of a book").
The patent system of today has lost touch with its original intentions, and has developed into something that is harmful to innovation and economic progress in many areas.
Pharmaceutical patents raise many ethical concerns, not least in relation to people in developing countries. They are also a driving force behind increasing costs for publicly funded health care systems in the member states.
We demand an initiative for a European study on the economic impact of pharmaceutical patents,
compared to other possible systems for financing drug research, and on alternatives to the current
Patents on life (including patents on seeds and on genes) and software patents should not be allowed.
EU and it's member states should adhere to the highest standards of democracy. Therefore such principles as transparent government, speedy and fair trial and freedom of speech should always be respected. In this day and age it is crucial to preserve the legal protection of citizens from arbitrary exercise of authority. The EU has an important role to play in shining a light on violations against civil rights in member states.
A democratic society needs a transparent state and non-transparent citizens. The citizens should be able to freely gather to formulate and express their opinions without fear of government surveillance. To expand this to an information society the right to anonymity in communication must be expanded. Therefore the secrecy of correspondence should encompass all digital communication.
It is the collective consensus of the gathered European Leaders that with the scarce resources of a new founded contender party, those resources must be focused on a well identified front bowling pin. Statistical data states that election participation has been on a continual down slope for the past decade and a half for first-time voters, while at the same time, the core support for our issues are in the 18-30 age range. This data is supported by membership demographics.
Therefore, the identified key catalyst target group is university students. Previous experience from elections where Pirate Parties have participated show that we are unusually strong at technical universities; up to ten times the national average. We need to broaden this scope to all universities. Universities are ideal in that they are a concentrated recruiting ground with people who are generally passionate about what they take part in.
Using Sweden as a template for numbers, assuming that these numbers are similar across other European countries with Pirate Parties, there are 300k university students. 100k votes are needed to get into the European Parliament. This means that we would need 33% of the votes of the university students, which is not a realistic number. Therefore, we must regard universities all across Europe as a recruiting ground for activists and ambassadors, who recruit voters in their turn. For example, there are another 125k 18-year-olds not yet in university, but who usually have friends there. There are friends, relatives, and social circles.
In other words, the key is to supply political passion about the issues to young people who would otherwise typically not vote at all, and encourage them to become recruiting ambassadors in their turn. There is no identified difference here between different political issues of ours.
To accomplish this, we need to supply these ambassadors with confidence, rhetoric and, where possible, political material to distribute in turn. This is a logistical challenge that needs to be met by each individual European Pirate Party.
In the European Parliament, it is the party groups that are the key to getting influence. Once elected, we will discuss with the groups that could be of interest, to determine which group is closest to us, and join that group.
Inside the group, we will do our utmost to persuade the other members of the group to join our position on the issues that fall within our political platform. In return, we´ll listen to the advice of the group on all other issues, and vote with the group unless we have some strong reasons not to.
When we are approached by lobbyists and other parties on issues that are outside the Pirate platform, we will refer them to the relevant person in the group and encourage them to make their case to him. This will allow us to focus on the issues that we really care about.
The decision making process in the EU is very complex, and in order to keep on top of what is happening we will need the support of the internet community. The Pirate movement is a grass roots movement that builds on the involvement of many activists working together using modern information technology. This way of working will be a strength that we can use to our benefit once elected.
While working with different issues in the EU, we will keep in mind the principles that we think should be the guiding stars of the EU itself:
Decisions should be taken as close to the citizens as possible. The EU should only handle issues that cannot be handled by the individual member states themselves.
The decision making process in the EU today works in a way that makes it very difficult for both media and ordinary citizens to follow what is happening and take part in the debate. This has to be improved. We need to work towards more transparency and openness.
The European Parliament is the only institution in Brussels that is directly elected by the voters. The role of parliament should be strengthened, so that power is moved out of the back rooms and into the open.
Pers-onnellement, ça me paraît très bien. Je regrette de ne pas avoir pu assister à la Conférence, même si je souhaiterais qu'il n'y en ait qu'une seule par an pour lui donner plus de densité et de profondeur.
Bref -- à vous les studios.